UKCustomPapers | What it mean to be an “American?”

What it mean to be an “American?”

Select one of the following prompts to guide your initial post.

What does it mean to be an “American?” Is there an overriding definition of what it means to be an “American?” Is it possible to encompass a multitude number of races, ethnicities, cultures, religions, and various identities into one single national identity? What is the danger behind pushing for a single “story?” Reflect on these questions critically in your answer.

Discuss the privileges ‘natural’ born U.S. citizens enjoy that people with different immigrant and migrant identities do not. What institutional or systemic factors give rise to nationalism for in-groups and oppression of the non-citizen groups?

Sample Answer

What Does It Mean to Be an “American?”

The question of what it means to be an “American” is profoundly complex and has been a subject of continuous debate, evolution, and contestation throughout U.S. history. There is no single, overriding definition that universally encompasses the myriad experiences, beliefs, and identities within the United States. Historically, notions of “American” identity have shifted dramatically, from early definitions tied to European Protestant heritage, to later expansions to include various immigrant groups (though often with significant assimilation pressures), to ongoing struggles for full inclusion by marginalized racial, ethnic, and Indigenous communities.

The traditional “melting pot” ideal, which suggested that diverse cultures would blend into a homogeneous American identity, has largely been challenged and superseded by the “salad bowl” or “mosaic” metaphor, where distinct cultural identities are maintained while contributing to the larger whole. This suggests that American identity is not about erasing individual heritage but about contributing to a collective tapestry.

Is It Possible to Encompass a Multitude of Identities into One Single National Identity?

It is not realistically possible, nor desirable, to encompass a multitude of races, ethnicities, cultures, religions, and various identities into one single, monolithic national identity. The strength of the United States, arguably, lies precisely in its diversity. Attempting to force a single, restrictive definition of “American” would inevitably exclude vast segments of the population whose histories, traditions, and perspectives do not fit a narrow mold.

Full Answer Section

Instead, what often unites people under the “American” banner are shared ideals, albeit imperfectly realized, such as:

Democratic principles: Belief in self-governance, voting rights, and the rule of law.
Constitutional rights: Upholding freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly.
Opportunity: The pursuit of the “American Dream,” often interpreted as upward mobility and a better life.
Civic participation: Engagement in community and national affairs.
Shared history: A collective narrative, however complex and often painful, that binds people to the nation’s past and future.

These ideals are abstract enough to allow for diverse interpretations and lived experiences. An individual can be a devout Muslim, a proud Mexican-American, and a patriotic U.S. citizen simultaneously. Their identity is a rich intersection of these elements, not a singular label.

The Danger Behind Pushing for a Single “Story”

Pushing for a single “story” or definition of what it means to be an “American” carries significant dangers:

Exclusion and Marginalization: A single narrative invariably establishes an “in-group” and an “out-group.” Those who do not fit the dominant story (often based on race, religion, language, or ancestry) are marginalized, alienated, and deemed “less American.” This can lead to systemic discrimination, prejudice, and a sense of not belonging for vast portions of the population. For example, historical attempts to define “American” as White, Anglo-Saxon, and Protestant led to the exclusion and oppression of Indigenous peoples, Black Americans, Asian immigrants, and many others.
Historical Revisionism and Erasure: A single story often whitewashes or ignores uncomfortable aspects of history, such as slavery, forced displacement of Indigenous populations, or discriminatory immigration policies. It suppresses the diverse contributions and struggles of different groups, leading to an incomplete and often misleading understanding of the nation’s past.
Suppression of Dissent and Critical Thinking: A singular narrative discourages critical examination of national myths and systemic injustices. It can foster an uncritical nationalism that views any critique as disloyal, stifling necessary conversations about progress and improvement.
Internal Conflict and Social Division: When a significant portion of the population feels their identity and experiences are not recognized or valued within the national story, it breeds resentment, division, and social unrest. Identity politics become more volatile when there is a perceived threat to one’s group identity or an imposed, alienating national identity.
Stagnation and Lack of Innovation: True strength and innovation often come from diverse perspectives and experiences. A single story limits the range of ideas, problem-solving approaches, and cultural richness available to a society, leading to intellectual and social stagnation.

In conclusion, the notion of a single “American” identity is an illusion that serves to exclude rather than unite. The reality is a mosaic of identities, constantly evolving and interacting. Embracing this multitude of stories, even when they conflict or challenge comfortable narratives, is essential for a more inclusive, resilient, and truly democratic nation. Acknowledging that one can be fully oneself – with all their racial, ethnic, cultural, and religious specificities – and still be fundamentally “American” is the most robust path forward.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer

Our Free Services

Paper Formatting

No Lateness!

Our Guarantees