Vulnerability, threat, and security assessment on a web application

You are hired to conduct a vulnerability, threat, and security assessment on a web application and submit your clear recommendation for corrective actions based on your assessment. This is based off a part of the Lab for the Week

This assignment is going to make use of the documents, lab report format, etc from the Lab this week.
In your Lab Report file, create a test plan that conforms to the OWASP standards and includes the following elements. You will be responsible for determining what to document in this report based on what you learn in your research. The two OWASP documents are attached if you need them below.
Make sure to cover these items:
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
Type of test you will use, White Box versus Black Box
Tools that you will use in the penetration test
Overview of the tests you would perform
Rationale for including each test
Write an 3-4-page paper addressing the above items.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

 

In order to provide the most current and relevant information for the vulnerability, threat, and security assessment, I need to ensure I have access to the latest OWASP documents and best practices. Since I cannot directly “receive” attached documents, I will simulate accessing them by performing a search for the most up-to-date OWASP testing guide and related methodologies.

After that, I will construct a comprehensive 3-4 page lab report draft, outlining the executive summary, table of contents, test type selection, tools, overview of tests, and rationale for each, all conforming to OWASP standards. The OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG) version 4.2 is the current stable version, with version 5.0 in development. I will base this report on the principles and methodologies outlined in WSTG 4.2, along with the OWASP Top 10: 2021, which provides a consensus on the most critical web application security risks.


Web Application Security Assessment: Test Plan Report

Version 1.0Date: July 8, 2025


 

Executive Summary

 

This document outlines a comprehensive test plan for conducting a vulnerability, threat, and security assessment of the target web application. The primary objective of this assessment is to identify existing security vulnerabilities, evaluate potential threats, and provide actionable recommendations for corrective actions. Leveraging OWASP standards, specifically the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG) and OWASP Top 10: 2021, this plan details the methodology, tools, and specific tests to be performed. The assessment will adopt a hybrid approach combining Black Box and White Box testing to ensure thorough coverage of both external attack surfaces and internal code logic. The findings will enable the development team to prioritize and remediate identified weaknesses,

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents

 

  1. Executive Summary
  2. Introduction
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Target Web Application Overview
  3. Type of Test: White Box vs. Black Box
    • Rationale for Hybrid Approach
  4. Penetration Testing Tools
    • Automated Tools
    • Manual Tools
  5. Overview of Tests to be Performed (OWASP WSTG Categories)
    • Information Gathering (WSTG-INFO)
    • Configuration and Deployment Management Testing (WSTG-CONF)
    • Identity Management Testing (WSTG-IDNT)
    • Authentication Testing (WSTG-AUTHN)
    • Authorization Testing (WSTG-AUTHZ)
    • Session Management Testing (WSTG-SESS)
    • Input Validation Testing (WSTG-INPV)
    • Error Handling Testing (WSTG-ERRH)
    • Cryptography Testing (WSTG-CRYP)
    • Business Logic Testing (WSTG-BUSL)
    • Client-Side Testing (WSTG-CLNT)
  6. Rationale for Including Each Test
  7. Corrective Action Recommendation Format
  8. Conclusion

 

2. Introduction

 

 

2.1. Purpose and Scope

 

The purpose of this test plan is to define the methodology and procedures for a security assessment of the designated web application. The assessment aims to:

  • Identify security vulnerabilities in the application and its underlying infrastructure.
  • Assess the potential impact of identified vulnerabilities.
  • Provide clear, prioritized recommendations for remediation.
  • Enhance the overall security posture of the web application in accordance with industry best practices and OWASP standards.

The scope of this assessment includes the web application’s front-end, back-end APIs, database interactions, associated server configurations, and any third-party components utilized.

 

2.2. Target Web Application Overview

 

(Note: In a real report, this section would include specific details about the target application, such as its name, primary function, architecture (e.g., front-end technologies, back-end frameworks, database type), user roles, and any relevant third-party integrations. For this generic template, it’s left as a placeholder.)


 

3. Type of Test: White Box vs. Black Box

 

For this assessment, a hybrid approach combining both Black Box and White Box testing will be employed.

  • Black Box Testing: This approach simulates an external attacker with no prior knowledge of the application’s internal structure, source code, or infrastructure. Testers interact with the application solely through its public interfaces (e.g., web browser, APIs).
    • Rationale: This provides a realistic view of how an unauthenticated or external attacker would perceive and attempt to exploit the application. It helps identify vulnerabilities exposed through external access points and misconfigurations visible from the outside.
  • White Box Testing (or Grey Box, given typical access levels): This approach involves having full knowledge of the application’s internal workings, including access to source code, architectural diagrams, configuration files, and potentially even direct database access.
    • Rationale: While a pure White Box test is comprehensive, in many professional scenarios, a “Grey Box” approach is more common, where testers have some level of privileged access (e.g., authenticated user accounts, API keys, partial source code access, or documentation). This allows for a deeper dive into the application’s logic, identifying vulnerabilities that might not be apparent from the outside (e.g., logical flaws, insecure coding practices, unhandled exceptions, hidden parameters). It is crucial for covering the OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities like Insecure Design and Software and Data Integrity Failures which often require code review.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer