Type of participants

Title Page
 Your title must include the variables and some articulation of relations between them(e.g.,
“difference between…”; “effects of x on y”).

 Your running head is a shortened but complete title within the character limit.
 Include all relevant parts of the title page.
 Be sure to follow APA style

Abstract
Your abstract includes
 the research question,
 variables,
 number and type of participants,
 major results, and
 implications/limitations of those results stated clearly and concisely within the limit of 250
words.

Introduction
Topic and Context
 Your paper (i.e., first paragraph or two) should begin in a broad manner and clearly explain the
problem to be investigated.

Literature review:
 Describe at least 3 studies in enough detail so that their relation to other studies and to the
relevant theoretical and methodological issues can be understood by the reader.
 The review is in your own words, and the focus is on the research, rather than the researchers.
 Present limitations of prior research and contrasting views/positions if any exist
 Provide a clear explanation of how the proposed study will answer this question or fill a research
gap.

Hypothesis
 End your introduction with a clearly stated hypothesis, and
 Offer directional predictions based on the previous literature.
 The hypothesis is testable. It is clear what the experimental groups will be and what will be
measured.

Method
Participants
 Describe the sample including a number of participants and all necessary characteristics.

Procedure
 Describe what was done, in order, with enough detail that a reader could replicate the study;
 Include the instructions and protocol.

Data management
 Describe how the dependent variable was measured (i.e., scoring, quantification)

Results
Descriptive statistics
 Provide the number of men and women, age range

Inferential Statistics
 Provide means and SD for each DV.
 For each t-test, describe the type of t-test and state findings in “plain English.”
Discussion
Interpretation
 Restate the findings briefly.\
 Note patterns in the data and relations among the variables
 Make sure that your conclusions do not go beyond the data.
 Connect your explanation/ interpretation back to the hypotheses and to the broader
psychological problem as represented in the introduction.
 Explain any discrepancies between the expected results and the actual data
 Summarize your take-home message clearly at the end.
Evaluation
 Discuss the extent to which the results are conclusive and can be generalized.
 Discuss potential confounds or methodological limits
 Describe future research.
References
 Include all and only cited articles.
 Articles are appropriately scholarly and appropriate to the topic.
 Sufficient recent sources make the review current, and classic studies are included if applicable
and available.
 Make sure that you make clear in your introduction how these papers are relevant.