The LucidChart then gives you the exact chart that needs to be filled in. It is a comparative policy analysis that requires a quantitative, and qualitative analysis of educational policies in Ontario at three different levels (Ministry, school board, schools) in two policy landscapes – one that focuses on LGBTQI2S inclusion and one that focuses on Indigenous education. As specified the topic looks at the extent of Two-Spirit inclusion and visibility. It is your job to find a comparative policy analytical tool from the decolonial-queer theoretical framework that supports running the research, producing the data, and displaying it ineffective visuals such as a pie chart for quantitative. As for the qualitative categories, I literally have helped you out by providing examples of ways this data can be approached – such as using bisexual visibility as an applicable cross-over that enables two-spirit analyses in this research. Once you have created the categories of methodology, how to measure for the quantitative and qualitative extent of Two SPirit inclusion in educational policy at all three levels (Ministry, School Board and school-specific – where I already have specific policies listed that fall into these categories on LucidChart), produced and displayed the data including methodological rationale and a discussion of findings you then need to add the comparative aspect. The comparative aspect is meant to be from the perspective of international education – and can mirror the policy landscapes done in Ontario (LGBTQI2S specific educational policies, and Indigenous student specific educational policies). In this way, you can then do the same results generation from that context. Then compare for a new set of data. In this way you have three major sets of data being present (Ontario, International – Comparative of the two). It’s legit all laid out in the LucidChart.