The program evaluation process

In light of what you read in the article, what are your thoughts with regard to considering a multi-disciplinary approach during the program evaluation process?

Do you think that sociological literature can help build a clear business case for using the sociological approach? Any examples you can elaborate on from the article?

In the “Kentucky Community and Technical College System” project, what are your thoughts on the goal setting process? What other examples of sociological interventions could have been proposed to the evaluation process?

To what extent did the author/evaluator use his sociological imagination? Please give examples to elaborate on this.Hougland used his sociological

Full Answer Section

Sociological literature to build a business case for using the sociological approach

Sociological literature can be used to build a clear business case for using the sociological approach to program evaluation. For example, sociological research can be used to demonstrate the impact of social factors on program outcomes. Sociological research can also be used to identify the best ways to reach and engage different target populations.

In the context of the KCTCS project, Hougland used sociological literature to demonstrate the impact of social factors on student success. For example, he found that students from low-income families were less likely to complete the KCTCS program than students from high-income families. He also found that students who were enrolled in the KCTCS program were more likely to be employed than students who were not enrolled in the program.

Goal setting process in the Kentucky Community and Technical College System project

The goal setting process in the KCTCS project was based on the following steps:

  1. Identify the stakeholders and their interests.
  2. Develop a shared understanding of the program's goals and objectives.
  3. Identify the specific outcomes that will be measured to assess the program's success.
  4. Develop a timeline for achieving the desired outcomes.
  5. Identify the resources that will be needed to achieve the desired outcomes.
  6. Develop a plan for monitoring and evaluating progress towards the desired outcomes.

This goal setting process was effective because it involved all of the relevant stakeholders and it was based on a shared understanding of the program's goals and objectives.

Other examples of sociological interventions

In addition to the interventions that were proposed in the KCTCS project, there are a number of other sociological interventions that could be used to improve the success of social programs. For example, sociological interventions can be used to:

  • Increase social capital among program participants.
  • Reduce social stigma associated with program participation.
  • Build community support for programs.
  • Address the root causes of social problems that are barriers to program participation.

The author's sociological imagination

The author/evaluator, Hougland, used his sociological imagination to understand the social forces that were impacting the KCTCS program. For example, he considered the impact of the state's economy on student enrollment and completion rates. He also considered the impact of the state's social service system on student success.

Hougland's use of sociological imagination allowed him to develop a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the KCTCS program and its impact on students. This understanding was essential for developing effective recommendations for improving the program.

Overall, Hougland's use of a multi-disciplinary approach and his sociological imagination were essential for the success of the KCTCS project. His work demonstrates the value of using sociological insights to improve the design and implementation of social programs.

Sample Answer

Multi-disciplinary approach to program evaluation

A multi-disciplinary approach to program evaluation can be beneficial in a number of ways. First, it can help to ensure that the evaluation is comprehensive and that all relevant factors are considered. Second, it can help to identify new and innovative ways to evaluate programs. Third, it can help to build buy-in from stakeholders and to increase the credibility of the evaluation findings.

In the context of the Kentucky Community and Technical College System (KCTCS) project, Hougland used a multi-disciplinary approach that included sociology, economics, and education. This approach allowed him to consider a wide range of factors that could impact the success of the KCTCS program, including the social and economic characteristics of the students, the quality of the instruction, and the availability of jobs in the local economy.