The nature of morality.

Full Answer Section

     

2. The Law of Nature:

Natural law theorists posit the existence of a "law of nature" governing human behavior. This law is not a set of written rules but a universal set of principles that can be discovered through reason and observation. These principles, derived from nature, dictate what is right and wrong, regardless of individual opinions or cultural norms.

3. Human Nature:

Natural law theorists believe that human nature itself reveals moral truths. They argue that humans are inherently social beings with the capacity for reason and compassion. These innate qualities, they argue, point to the moral obligations of fairness, justice, and care for others. "How nature is reveals how it should be": This statement is a core tenet of natural law theory. It suggests that the way the natural world functions provides a model for moral behavior. For example, observing that animals care for their young leads to the moral principle of parental responsibility. This doesn't necessarily mean mimicking nature's "law of the jungle" but rather understanding the inherent values that exist within the natural order. Criticisms of Natural Law Theory: While natural law theory has been influential in shaping moral philosophy, it faces criticisms:

• Subjectivity: Interpretations of "natural laws" and the "telos" of things can be subjective, leading to differing moral conclusions.
• Unclear Connection to Human Behavior: It's not always clear how natural phenomena translate to human actions and responsibilities.
• Problem of Evil: The existence of suffering and injustice in the natural world challenges the notion that nature inherently points to moral goodness.

Examples:

• Thomas Aquinas's Natural Law Theory: Aquinas argued that the natural law derives from God's eternal law and is accessible to humans through reason.
• The Declaration of Independence: The document states that all men are endowed with certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, reflecting a natural law approach to human rights.

Conclusion: Natural law theory provides a framework for understanding the relationship between morality and nature. However, its reliance on interpretations of natural phenomena and the inherent "telos" of things can lead to subjectivity and debate. Despite its criticisms, natural law theory continues to influence discussions about ethics, human rights, and the foundations of moral reasoning.  

Sample Answer

       

Morality and Nature: A Natural Law Perspective

Natural law theory posits that morality is inherent in the natural order of the universe and can be discovered through reason and observation. It proposes that "how nature is reveals how it should be," meaning that the way the natural world operates provides clues to what is right and wrong.

According to natural law theorists, nature reveals morality through:

1. Teleological Reasoning:

This approach emphasizes the inherent purpose or "telos" of things in nature. For example, the natural function of a human eye is to see. Thus, anything that hinders or destroys eyesight is considered morally wrong. Natural law theorists argue that by observing the natural world and its inherent purposes, we can discern moral principles that govern human behavior.