The DNA process

Full Answer Section

The PCR Process

The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is a revolutionary molecular biology technique used to amplify a single copy, or a few copies, of a segment of DNA across several orders of magnitude, generating thousands to millions of copies of a particular DNA sequence. It works by repeatedly heating and cooling a DNA sample in the presence of primers (short DNA sequences that define the region to be amplified), DNA polymerase (an enzyme that synthesizes new DNA strands), and free DNA nucleotides. Each cycle doubles the amount of target DNA.

Advantages of the PCR Mechanism:

1. High Sensitivity and Specificity: PCR can amplify DNA from extremely minute samples, even just a few cells (e.g., from a single hair, a drop of saliva, or a tiny bloodstain). This makes it incredibly powerful in forensics where sample sizes are often limited. Furthermore, it is highly specific, meaning it can target and amplify a particular DNA sequence from a complex mixture of DNA, distinguishing it from other similar sequences, even by a single nucleotide difference.
2. Speed and Efficiency: PCR can produce millions to billions of copies of a specific DNA segment in just a few hours. Before PCR, amplifying DNA was a laborious and time-consuming process. This rapid amplification allows for quick analysis, which is critical in time-sensitive investigations and clinical diagnostics. It has also enabled automation, allowing for the processing of many samples concurrently.

Why it is so widely used in the scientific community and in forensics:

PCR is widely used because its advantages directly address critical needs in these fields:

• Scientific Community: Researchers can amplify specific genes for cloning, sequencing, mutation detection, and gene expression studies. It underpins large-scale projects like the Human Genome Project. Its ability to work with minute or degraded samples has also revolutionized fields like paleontology (studying ancient DNA) and evolutionary biology.
• Forensics: Its high sensitivity means that even trace amounts of biological material left at a crime scene can yield enough DNA for profiling. Its specificity ensures that the correct human DNA is amplified from potentially contaminated samples. Its speed allows for faster investigative leads and convictions (or exonerations). PCR is fundamental to DNA profiling, paternity testing, and identification of remains.

Inventor of PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction)

The inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is Kary Banks Mullis.

Interesting Highlight of His Career: An interesting highlight of Kary Mullis's career is his unconventional and often eccentric approach to science and life, which contrasted with the traditional academic path. While working as a DNA chemist at Cetus Corporation, he famously conceived the idea for PCR during a late-night drive to his cottage in Northern California in 1983. He later shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this invention. Beyond PCR, Mullis was known for his unconventional views on scientific consensus (e.g., AIDS and climate change denial), and he also held patents for inventions unrelated to PCR, such as a UV-sensitive plastic and a system for instantly mobilizing the immune system. He even, for a time, ran a business selling jewelry containing amplified DNA of deceased famous people like Elvis Presley. This showcases a highly curious and independent mind, unafraid to challenge norms, which ultimately led to one of the most significant biotechnological breakthroughs.

Alec Jeffreys

Alec Jeffreys is a British geneticist from Leicester University in England, renowned for his groundbreaking work in DNA fingerprinting.

Forensic Points about Alec Jeffreys' Career from Leicester University:

1. Discovery of DNA Fingerprinting (1984): While at the University of Leicester in 1984, Alec Jeffreys had a "eureka moment" when observing X-ray film images of DNA from a technician's family. He noticed patterns of repeated DNA sequences (minisatellites) that were unique to individuals but shared similarities among family members. This discovery of highly variable regions in human DNA formed the basis of what he termed "DNA fingerprinting."
2. First Use in Criminal and Immigration Cases (1985-1986): Jeffreys' work quickly gained forensic significance. In 1985, his techniques were used to resolve a disputed immigration case, proving family relationships. Most famously, in 1986, his method was instrumental in solving the "Pitchfork murders" in Leicestershire, where DNA evidence not only exonerated the initial suspect but also identified the actual perpetrator, Colin Pitchfork, through a mass DNA screening of local men. This marked the first time DNA evidence was used to identify a criminal in a police investigation, revolutionizing forensic science worldwide.

Alec Jeffreys' work is so significant to forensic science because he provided the fundamental concept and initial experimental method for using individual genetic variations to establish identity and kinship. His discoveries laid the groundwork for modern DNA profiling, making it possible to definitively link suspects to crime scenes, exonerate the innocent, and resolve paternity and immigration disputes with unprecedented accuracy and reliability. His pioneering efforts at Leicester University directly ushered in the era of forensic DNA evidence.

Sample Answer

DNA Typing in the Criminal Justice Community

The question of whether DNA typing has been over-emphasized or under-emphasized by the criminal justice community is complex. From one perspective, its power in providing definitive links (or exclusions) to crime scenes is unparalleled, suggesting it might be under-emphasized in terms of its full potential for widespread application and clearing wrongful convictions. It has revolutionized forensic science, making previously unsolvable cases solvable and providing a level of certainty that other forms of evidence often lack. However, it could also be argued that it has been over-emphasized in terms of public perception, sometimes leading to an unrealistic expectation that DNA evidence will always be available and always solve a crime, potentially diverting resources or attention from other crucial investigative techniques when DNA is not present or usable. Its technical nature also requires careful presentation in court to avoid misinterpretation by juries.