The 8th Amendment and the Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Trials

The reaction paper should be three pages long. The papers should include summaries of the article selected. The last page should be reserved for a personal reaction to the article selected. Here is more information about the paper. You are to prepare a reaction paper to one of these articles (see below). The papers should include summaries of the article selected. The last page should be reserved for a personal reaction to the article selected. It can be single or double spaced. I am not concerned about a particular format. The paper should be well organized, with good intro, body that covers the themes highlight by the author(s). Then you should offer a summary of what you have read, then a paragraph for a personal reaction and policy implications. In other words, I leave a lot of this up to you. I just want to read your paper and be convinced that you have actually read the article! I am looking for desсrіptive, succinct summaries and a reaction to the reading. Include in your reactions answers to the following questions: Did you agree or disagree? What policy recommendations emerge from your choice of assigned readings? Go to the the following link: http://pulse.uta.edu/vwebv/enterCourseReserve.do Select the ″Course Reserves″ tab Search for materials by instructor′s name and/or course. Use the drop down arrow to select your instructor′s name, then cursor down to select the course number You′ll see a list of all materials on reserve for that course. Note that all E-reserve readings will be listed first, followed by the On-Site Reserves. Some articles may not be available due to last minute contract disputes If the article is not on the list below, but appears in the course reserve (under my name) you may use it. PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL HLR ARTICLES MUST BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE REGULAR UTA LIBRARY DATABASE. ALL OTHERS CAN BE REACHED VIA COURSE RESERVE. Harvard Law Review. 1994. “The 8th Amendment and the Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Trials,” Harvard Law Review. Vol 107. You are to prepare a reaction paper to one of these articles. The reaction paper should be three pages long. The papers should include summaries of the article selected. The last page should be reserved for a personal reaction to the article selected. I am looking for desсrіptive, succinct summaries and a reaction to the reading. Include in your reactions answers to the following questions: Did you agree or disagree? What policy recommendations emerge from your choice of assigned readings?