Discuss in detail subcultural theory as it relates to delinquency and crime. Further briefly without using quotes give an overview of this article i.e., Nwalozie, C. J. (2015). Rethinking subculture and subcultural theory in the study of youth crime - A theoretical discourse. Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology, 7(1), 1-16. https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy2.apus.edu/docview/1674473354/fulltextPDF/87E607B8DCF04C5CPQ/1?accountid=8289
Subcultural Theory and Its Relation to Delinquency and Crime
Subcultural Theory and Its Relation to Delinquency and Crime
Overview of Subcultural Theory
Subcultural theory emerged in the mid-20th century as a framework for understanding the relationship between subcultures and patterns of delinquency and crime. This theory posits that certain groups within society form their own distinctive cultures, complete with unique values, norms, and behaviors that may diverge from those of the mainstream society. These subcultures often arise in response to shared experiences, social conditions, or marginalization, leading to the development of behavioral patterns that can include criminality.
Key Elements of Subcultural Theory
1. Cultural Values: Subcultures often develop their own distinct values that can conflict with dominant societal norms. These values may prioritize loyalty to the group, anti-establishment sentiments, or alternative definitions of success that can lead to delinquent behavior.
2. Socialization: Individuals who grow up within subcultures are socialized into the group's norms and values, which can include acceptance of criminal behavior as a means to achieve status or respect within the group. The process of socialization reinforces these values, making delinquent behavior more likely among its members.
3. Marginalization: Subcultural theory often examines how social, economic, and political marginalization can lead to the formation of subcultures. Groups that feel disenfranchised may create their own cultural identities as a way to cope with societal rejection and economic hardship. This marginalization can foster an environment where criminal behavior is not only accepted but encouraged.
4. Resistance to Authority: Many subcultures are characterized by a resistance to authority and societal norms. This can manifest in various ways, including rebellion against legal systems and societal expectations, contributing to patterns of delinquency.
5. Group Dynamics: The sense of belonging to a subculture can create strong group dynamics that encourage conformity to the group's norms, including those related to crime and delinquency. Individuals may engage in criminal activity not only as a means of survival but also to maintain their status within the group.
Application of Subcultural Theory to Delinquency and Crime
Subcultural theory has been applied extensively in criminological studies to explain various forms of delinquency, including gang violence, drug-related crimes, and youth deviance. For example, gang members often adhere to a code that glorifies violence and criminal behavior, leading to higher rates of delinquency among youths involved in gangs. By understanding the cultural context in which these behaviors occur, researchers and policymakers can better address the root causes of youth crime.
Additionally, subcultural theory helps explain why some individuals engage in criminal acts despite understanding the legal consequences. The strong influence of group identity and loyalty can lead individuals to prioritize their allegiance to their subculture over adherence to societal laws.
Overview of Nwalozie's Article
In the article "Rethinking Subculture and Subcultural Theory in the Study of Youth Crime," Nwalozie critically examines the concept of subculture within the context of youth crime. He explores how traditional interpretations of subcultural theory may not fully encapsulate the complexities of youth behavior in contemporary society.
Nwalozie argues for a re-evaluation of subcultural theory by considering the evolving nature of youth identities and the impact of globalization, technology, and social media on subcultures. He emphasizes that while subcultures can contribute to delinquency, they are also influenced by broader societal factors such as economic conditions and cultural shifts.
The article encourages a more nuanced understanding of how youth subcultures interact with mainstream culture and how this dynamic shapes patterns of crime and delinquency. Ultimately, Nwalozie advocates for an interdisciplinary approach that integrates insights from sociology, psychology, and criminology to better understand youth crime in modern contexts. By doing so, he hopes to foster more effective interventions and policies aimed at addressing youth delinquency.
In summary, Nwalozie's article presents a comprehensive discourse on rethinking subculture in relation to youth crime while highlighting the need for updated theoretical frameworks that reflect contemporary realities.