Some argue that frequent exposure to rap and hip hop music promotes negative social behavior

. Some argue that frequent exposure to rap and hip hop music promotes negative social behavior. Others defend the music, arguing that the music depicts reality. Select a position and defend it.

  1. Explain how either music or aromas can facilitate persuasion in relation to Petty & Cacioppo’s Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM).
  2. Identify three distinct ways in which advertisers use music to persuade.
  3. From the standpoint of persuasion, which of the ethical perspectives in Box 16.1 (p. 416) do you consider the most ethically defensible, and why?
  4. Are researchers who study persuasion responsible for the uses to which their findings and results are put? Is it the researcher’s fault if a persuasive strategy he/she has studied is used by an unscrupulous persuader?
find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

I contend that rap and hip hop music primarily depicts a reality experienced by a segment of society, serving as a powerful form of artistic expression, social commentary, and cultural reflection. While some lyrical content may describe or even glorify negative behaviors, to argue that the music promotes such behavior in a causal sense oversimplifies complex social issues and overlooks the genre’s multifaceted nature.

Firstly, many artists within rap and hip hop use their music as a platform to narrate lived experiences, particularly those from marginalized communities. Themes of poverty, systemic injustice, violence, drug use, and struggle are often raw and explicit because they reflect the harsh realities faced by individuals in certain environments. This raw depiction can serve as a form of social critique, drawing attention to societal failures and the consequences of inequality. For many listeners, especially those from similar backgrounds, the music acts as a mirror,

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

 

Secondly, art, in its broadest sense, has always held a mirror to society, showcasing both its beauty and its ugliness. Rap and hip hop are no exception. Just as literature, film, or other music genres explore human vices and struggles, so too does hip hop. To blame the music for promoting negative behavior is akin to blaming news reporting for promoting crime by covering it. The depiction of reality, even an uncomfortable one, does not automatically equate to endorsement or promotion. Listeners, particularly adolescents, are influenced by a myriad of factors including family environment, peer groups, socioeconomic status, education, and individual psychological predispositions, far more profoundly than by music alone. Causal links between music consumption and direct behavioral outcomes are notoriously difficult to establish and often overlook these confounding variables.

Finally, the genre is incredibly diverse, encompassing a wide range of themes beyond those typically criticized. Many artists focus on personal ambition, overcoming adversity, community upliftment, love, spiritual growth, and financial literacy. Critiques that generalize the entire genre based on a subset of its content ignore its rich artistic complexity, poetic lyricism, and its role as a global cultural phenomenon that inspires creativity, entrepreneurship, and identity for millions.

Therefore, while the content can be controversial and warrant critical discussion, attributing the promotion of negative social behavior primarily to rap and hip hop music misunderstands its role as a vibrant artistic medium reflecting, rather than solely creating, societal complexities.


2. Explain how either music or aromas can facilitate persuasion in relation to Petty & Cacioppo’s Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM).

Let’s focus on music and how it can facilitate persuasion in relation to Petty & Cacioppo’s Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM). The ELM proposes two routes to persuasion: the central route and the peripheral route. The effectiveness of music depends on the listener’s motivation and ability to process the message, which determines which route they take.

  1. Peripheral Route Processing:

    • How Music Facilitates: When a listener has low motivation or ability to process the persuasive message (e.g., they are distracted, tired, or the message is irrelevant to them), they are likely to engage in peripheral route processing. In this scenario, music acts as a peripheral cue.
    • Mechanism:
      • Positive Affect: Upbeat, pleasant, or familiar music can evoke positive emotions, which are then associated with the product, service, or idea being advertised. For example, a catchy jingle in a commercial might make a brand seem more appealing, even if the listener isn’t paying close attention to the product’s features. The positive feeling generated by the music is transferred to the persuasive message.
      • Source Attractiveness/Credibility (indirectly): Well-produced, trendy music can make an advertisement or a persuader seem more modern, appealing, or “cool,” subtly enhancing perceived attractiveness or credibility without the listener critically evaluating the actual message content.
      • Distraction/Reduced Counter-arguing: Upbeat music can sometimes distract listeners from the core message, making them less likely to generate counter-arguments. This can make a weak argument more persuasive because the listener isn’t scrutinizing it.
    • Example: A car commercial with exciting, adventurous background music. A viewer who isn’t actively looking for a car might simply associate the positive feeling from the music with the car brand, leading to a favorable, but temporary, attitude toward the car.
  2. Central Route Processing (Indirectly or with caution):

    • How Music Facilitates: When a listener has high motivation and ability to process the message, they engage in central route processing, focusing on the arguments’ quality. Music is generally less effective here as a direct persuasive element. However, it can indirectly facilitate central route processing or influence it in subtle ways:
    • Mechanism:
      • Setting the Mood/Attention: Music can set a serious or contemplative mood, drawing attention to the message and potentially making the listener more receptive to processing the arguments. For instance, somber music preceding a public service announcement might prepare the audience to take the message more seriously.
      • Enhancing Recall of Arguments: If music is linked very directly and meaningfully to the content of strong arguments (e.g., a mnemonic jingle that helps remember complex product benefits), it could potentially enhance recall of those arguments, thereby supporting central processing. However, if the music distracts from the core message, it could hinder central processing.
      • Source Perceived Trustworthiness (Subtle): Music that matches the perceived seriousness or authenticity of a message could subtly enhance the perceived trustworthiness of the source, making the arguments seem more credible.
    • Caution: If the music is too prominent or incongruent with the message, it can actually detract from central processing by acting as a distraction. The core of central route processing relies on the strength of the arguments, not peripheral cues.

In summary, music primarily operates as a peripheral cue, fostering positive affect and associating it with the persuasive target when elaboration is low. In high-elaboration contexts, its role is more nuanced, potentially affecting attention or mood but less directly influencing argument scrutiny.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer