Do a thorough interrogation of the various positions these two books take with regard to the ethics of “giving to others.” For many of you, it will seem a “no-brainer” that, ethically speaking,” we should all (and always) at least consider giving to others (Singer’s position). However, as Callahan posits, the act of giving (especially by the wealthy) is necessarily an act of power and typically results in further advancing the wealth and force of the giver. What are the issues underlying these claims? In a ¾ page, single spaced Abstract, flesh out the intricacies as you see them.

The two we are comparing are (Peter Singer) and (David Callahan)

Singer VS Callahan “giving to others”