Find and discuss 2 scholarly research articles that address the effectiveness of premarital/remarital counseling. In addition, consider how you would use the research from these articles in your premarital/remarital counseling.
Find and discuss 2 scholarly research articles that address the effectiveness of premarital/remarital counseling. In addition, consider how you would use the research from these articles in your premarital/remarital counseling.
Premarital and remarital counseling, often bundled under the umbrella of "relationship education," have been extensively studied through longitudinal research. The consensus in the field is that highly structured, skill-based programs are effective preventative tools, not only by improving initial relationship quality but also by promoting healthier relationship maintenance behaviors years later.
The following discussion synthesizes findings from two prominent research trajectories concerning the efficacy of relationship education (RE) programs, which form the basis of most premarital and remarital counseling models.
| Study Focus | Key Findings |
|---|---|
| Stanley, Rhoades, & Markman (2017) and related work on the PREP Model | Lower Divorce/Separation Rates: Longitudinal studies consistently find that couples who participate in structured premarital counseling programs, such as the Prevention and Relationship Enhancement Program (PREP), have significantly lower rates of separation and divorce (up to 30-50% lower in some studies) compared to those who do not. |
| Mechanism of Change | The effectiveness is strongly tied to the skill-building component, particularly: 1. Improved Communication and Conflict Management: Teaching structured methods (like the speaker-listener technique) for discussing difficult topics. 2. Realistic Expectations: Helping couples adjust idealistic marital expectations (Snippet 1.2), which often include false assumptions about how much a spouse can fulfill every need. |
| Conclusion | Premarital counseling functions as a robust preventative intervention that equips couples with tangible tools to manage conflict effectively and sustain satisfaction over time. |
| Study Focus | Key Findings |
|---|---|
| Lucier-Greer & Adler-Baeder (2012) Meta-Analysis on Relationship Education for Stepfamilies | Effectiveness in Remarriage: The meta-analytic review specifically examined couple and relationship education (CRE) programs targeting participants in stepfamilies (a common feature of remarriage). The findings showed that these programs were modestly effective in positively influencing participant outcomes, suggesting that structured, focused intervention can address the unique complexities of remarriage (e.g., parenting conflicts, boundary setting with ex-spouses). |
| Secondary Benefit: The "Gateway Effect" (Stanley, 2001) | Research by Stanley and colleagues also identified a phenomenon known as the "Gateway Effect." They found that participation in premarital education made couples more likely to seek subsequent couples therapy earlier if they experienced relationship distress later in their marriage (Snippet 1.6). |
| Conclusion | For remarriage, counseling's value is dual: it provides essential stepfamily management skills, and it normalizes the idea of seeking professional help, thus lowering the barrier for couples to get assistance before distress becomes critical. |
I would integrate the findings from these two bodies of research to structure the counseling process, ensuring it is both skills-based and future-focused.
Action: I would dedicate the majority of sessions to teaching and practicing specific, structured communication and conflict resolution skills (e.g., the speaker-listener technique, validating emotions).
Rationale: The research shows that simply talking about issues is less effective than learning a defined set of skills that lead to the positive outcomes (lower divorce rates). By focusing on concrete, repeatable techniques, I honor the finding that the tangible tools, rather than just abstract discussion, drive marital stability.
Example: When a couple argues about finances, I would stop the content discussion to focus on the process—asking them to use "I statements" and reflective listening until they achieve mutual validation, thereby reinforcing the core skills proven effective by PREP and similar models.
Action: For couples entering remarriage or a stepfamily dynamic, I would use the finding on specialized program effectiveness to dedicate sessions entirely to stepfamily challenges. This includes defining parental roles, setting clear boundaries with ex-partners, and discussing the slow timeline for stepparent-stepchild bonding.
Rationale: Remarriages fail at a higher rate partly due to stepfamily stress. The evidence suggests that specialized, psychoeducational programs can help. I would therefore focus on the systemic issues inherent in blending families, rather than just couple dynamics.
Action: I would proactively discuss the normalcy of future relationship struggles and include a "post-counseling plan." I would frame the current counseling as a foundation, not a cure, and emphasize that the best couples see therapy as a preventative maintenance tool—their "relationship annual check-up."