1.) Kantian ethics claims that the rightness or wrongness of an action depends on the intention. Is this claim consistent with a compatibilist theory of free will (such as Frankfurt's or Wolf's)? Explain.
2.) The argument from evil is based on claims about what a perfectly good God would do. To support this premise, we need some idea what makes an agent good or bad. Assume utilitarianism is the correct theory of good and bad. Does the argument from evil work under this assumption? Explain your answer.
3.) If Chisholm is correct that our free actions are the result of agent (immanent) causation, can we be responsible for our virtues and vices, as they are understood in virtue ethics? Explain your answer.