Answer these questions: What are the main arguments he makes? What is his main hypothetical case he appeals to in his argument? Explain the case. Does he make any analogies? If so, what are the terms of the analogies? Explain these terms. What conclusions does he draw from them?
Peter Singer’s main argument in “Famine, Affluence and Morality.” This is the link of the article:
http://phitosophyfaculty.ucsd.edu/faculty/rarneson/Courses/Singeressayspring1972. pdf