Persuading Climate Change Skeptics: A Personal Approach

After reading Seymour (2018) and watching the Amanda Gorman and Prof. Katharine Hayhoe Ted Talk videos, write an original post of 250-300 words that conveys your thoughts about the following question:

Given everything that you have learned in GEOG*3020DE, what approach would you take if you were speaking with a friend or relative who is skeptical of the science behind climate change and/or feels so overwhelmed that they choose not to read about or acknowledge it?

Be sure that your original post indicates which, if any, of the following tactics your approach would reflect: quoting science and social science research that documents climate change and its impacts, appeal to emotion, incorporate irony/satire/irreverence, express empathy and try to find common ground by drawing from your own observations and experiences.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

Persuading Climate Change Skeptics: A Personal Approach

When engaging with a friend or relative who is skeptical of climate change or feels overwhelmed by the topic, it’s crucial to approach the conversation with empathy and understanding. Drawing from my learnings in GEOG*3020DE, I would employ a combination of tactics to address their skepticism or avoidance of the issue.

First and foremost, I would appeal to emotion by sharing personal observations and experiences related to climate change. By recounting how extreme weather events, melting ice caps, or changes in ecosystems have impacted me or others, I aim to humanize the issue and make it more relatable.

Additionally, I would quote science and social science research to provide factual evidence supporting the reality of climate change and its far-reaching consequences. Presenting concrete data on rising global temperatures, sea-level rise, biodiversity loss, and other indicators can help validate the scientific consensus on the issue.

Expressing empathy towards their feelings of overwhelm is essential. Acknowledging the complexity and scale of the problem while emphasizing the collective responsibility we share in addressing it can help alleviate their sense of helplessness.

Lastly, incorporating elements of irony, satire, or irreverence can sometimes make the topic more approachable. Using humor to highlight the absurdity of denying climate change in the face of overwhelming evidence might resonate with skeptics in a non-confrontational manner.

By combining these approaches, I strive to create a dialogue that is informative, empathetic, and engaging. Encouraging open-mindedness and fostering a sense of shared responsibility towards our planet can potentially inspire positive action and a shift in perspective regarding climate change.

 

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer