Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Paper Formatting
Double or single-spaced
1-inch margin
12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
300 words per page
No Lateness!
Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay
Our Guarantees
Free Unlimited revisions
Guaranteed Privacy
Money Return guarantee
Plagiarism Free Writing
Moral philosophies that influence ethics and explain how they impact decision-making.
Create an 8-10 slide PowerPoint presentation for a workplace training session for HR professionals on ethical decision-making. Include detailed speaker notes explaining the information on each slide.
Include the following:
Provide an overview of at least three moral philosophies that influence ethics and explain how they impact decision-making. Describe two examples of emerging (trending) ethical dilemmas faced by HR professionals. Include a 2-3 sentence explanation of each example. Examine the role of individual and organizational factors and how they each influence ethical decision making in business. Describe three practical tools for ethical decision-making (e.g., stakeholder analysis, ethical frameworks, etc.). Research and summarize two case studies or scenarios related to ethical decision-making that could be used for group discussion during the training session. Include the speaker's notes for each slide. Speaker's notes should adequately explain, expand, and express your main points for each slide. Create a title slide and a sources slide. (Note: these will not count toward the 8-slide minimum.) Include correct in-text citations and a "Sources" slide using the SWS Guidelines for Presentations. Provide a minimum of 3 quality academic resources in addition to utilizing information from your weekly readings and media content.
Sample Answer
This outline provides the content, structure, and detailed speaker notes for an 8-10 slide PowerPoint presentation on ethical decision-making for HR professionals.
📊 PowerPoint Presentation Outline: Ethical Decision-Making for HR
Slide 1: Title Slide
Title
Ethical Decision-Making: Navigating Complexity in Human Resources
Subtitle
Core Philosophies, Emerging Dilemmas, and Practical Tools for HR Leaders
Presenter
[Your Name/Training Department]
Date
[Date]
Slide 2: Introduction and Overview of Ethical Philosophies
Headline: The Ethical Foundation: Three Philosophies Shaping HR Decisions
Content:
Ethics Defined: Principles that govern a person's or group's behavior. For HR, this means balancing organizational goals with employee rights and societal welfare.
Three Key Moral Philosophies:
Utilitarianism (Consequences): Focuses on the greatest good for the greatest number.
Deontology (Duty/Rules): Focuses on moral duties and universal rules, regardless of consequences.
Virtue Ethics (Character): Focuses on the moral character of the decision-maker and their development of virtues (e.g., honesty, fairness).
Impact on HR: These lenses inform how we approach fairness, privacy, and organizational well-being (Caldwell et al., 2014).
Speaker Notes:
"Welcome. Today, we're focusing on ethical decision-making, which is the cornerstone of our role in HR. We manage the delicate balance between the organization's strategic needs and the individual's rights."
"We begin with philosophy. Utilitarianism asks: 'Which choice yields the best outcome for the most employees, even if a few individuals are negatively affected?' A downsizing decision, for example, is often justified this way."
"Deontology, in contrast, looks at duty. It asks: 'Does this decision violate a fundamental moral rule or policy, such as the duty to treat all employees with respect, regardless of the consequences?' This is crucial for non-discrimination policies."
"Virtue Ethics is about who we are as leaders. It asks: 'What would a truly fair and honest HR professional do?' It promotes developing virtues like integrity and compassion in our daily choices."
Slide 3: Emerging Ethical Dilemmas in Modern HR
Headline: Navigating the New Landscape: Trending Ethical Dilemmas
Content:
1. AI Bias in Hiring and Performance Management:
Explanation: The use of algorithms and AI tools to screen résumés or monitor productivity can inadvertently perpetuate or amplify historical biases present in the training data, leading to unfair exclusion of protected groups. HR must ensure algorithmic fairness and transparency (Johnson, 2021).