Full Answer Section

Risks associated with manual patching

There are two main risks associated with manual patching:

• Human error: Manual patching is more prone to human error than automated patching. For example, a system administrator may forget to install a patch, install a patch incorrectly, or install a patch that is not compatible with the system.
• Delayed patching: Manual patching can be delayed for a variety of reasons, such as a lack of resources, competing priorities, or the need to coordinate with other teams. This can leave systems vulnerable to attack for an extended period of time.

Letter of intent to directors

Dear Directors,

I am writing to inform you of my policy on manual patching. I will only permit manual patching in the following situations:

• When a patch is not available for an automated patching system.
• When a patch is too complex or risky to automate.
• When a patch is needed for a critical system that cannot be taken offline.

In all other cases, I will require that patches be applied automatically using our automated patching system.

I understand that manual patching can be necessary in certain situations, but I believe that it is important to minimize the use of manual patching whenever possible. Manual patching is more prone to human error and can lead to delayed patching, both of which can increase the risk of cyberattacks.

I am committed to protecting our organization from cyberattacks, and I believe that this policy on manual patching will help us to achieve that goal.

Sincerely, [Your name]

Discussion of peers’ manual patching policy communication

I agree with my peers that manual patching should be minimized whenever possible. However, I believe that there are some situations where manual patching is necessary, such as when a patch is not available for an automated patching system or when a patch is needed for a critical system that cannot be taken offline.

I also agree with my peers that it is important to communicate the manual patching policy to directors. Directors need to be aware of the risks associated with manual patching and the situations in which manual patching will be permitted.

Conclusion

Manual patching is a risky practice, but it may be necessary in certain situations. It is important to minimize the use of manual patching whenever possible and to communicate the manual patching policy to directors.