Juvenile prosecution.

Should we revisit how juveniles are prosecuted? Explain your reasoning and address both prosecution in juvenile court and in adult court under the waiver system. Include the economic implications of juvenile prosecution and consider the individual, group, and community implications of juvenile prosecution in your response.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

Should we revisit how juveniles are prosecuted?

Yes, we should revisit how juveniles are prosecuted. The current system is outdated and does not take into account the unique needs of juveniles.

Prosecution in juvenile court:

Juvenile courts are designed to rehabilitate juveniles, not punish them. However, the current juvenile justice system is often punitive and can lead to juveniles being incarcerated in adult prisons. This can have a devastating impact on their lives, making it difficult for them to reintegrate into society and succeed.

Prosecution in adult court under the waiver system:

The waiver system allows juveniles to be tried in adult court. This is a serious problem because adult courts are not designed to rehabilitate juveniles. Juveniles who are tried in adult court are more likely to be incarcerated and to recidivate.

Full Answer Section

Economic implications of juvenile prosecution:

Juvenile prosecution is expensive. The cost of incarcerating a juvenile is significantly higher than the cost of providing them with community-based services. Additionally, juvenile recidivism costs society billions of dollars each year.

Individual, group, and community implications of juvenile prosecution:

Juvenile prosecution has a number of negative individual, group, and community implications.

Individual implications: Juvenile prosecution can have a devastating impact on an individual’s life. Juveniles who are incarcerated are more likely to experience mental health problems, substance abuse problems, and educational failure. They are also more likely to become victims of crime.
Group implications: Juvenile prosecution can also have a negative impact on groups of juveniles, such as communities of color and low-income communities. These groups are disproportionately represented in the juvenile justice system. Juvenile prosecution can further marginalize these groups and make it difficult for them to achieve social justice.
Community implications: Juvenile prosecution can also have a negative impact on communities as a whole. Juvenile crime is often a symptom of larger social problems, such as poverty, unemployment, and lack of educational opportunities. Juvenile prosecution does not address these underlying problems. In fact, it can often exacerbate them.
Conclusion:

The current system of juvenile prosecution is outdated and does not take into account the unique needs of juveniles. It is expensive and has a number of negative individual, group, and community implications. We need to revisit how we prosecute juveniles and develop a system that is more focused on rehabilitation than punishment.

Recommendations for reforming the juvenile justice system:
Increase investment in community-based prevention and intervention programs. These programs can help to reduce juvenile crime and recidivism.
Reduce reliance on incarceration. Incarceration should be a last resort for juveniles. Community-based sanctions should be used whenever possible.
End racial and socioeconomic disparities in the juvenile justice system. Juveniles of color and low-income juveniles are disproportionately represented in the juvenile justice system. We need to address these disparities to create a more just and equitable system.
Develop evidence-based juvenile justice policies and practices. We need to base our juvenile justice policies and practices on research and evidence. This will help to ensure that we are using the most effective methods to rehabilitate juveniles and reduce recidivism.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer