## Interval and Ratio Statistics and the Concept of Significance

Interval and Ratio Statistics and the Concept of Significance

Order Description

Use Excel to complete the Exercise on (ANOVA)
2) Answer the questions at the end of the exercise and write 2 pages summary report pls note that no table should be in the words document report and follow the rubric

below to complete this assingment.
3 the originality of this assignment is expected as it will go thru the turnitin for similarity, and it will not be accepted I more than 10% similarity in the

tunritin.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning

the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
A large health maintenance organization is interested in the prescribing patterns of physicians. Suppose that we selected a random sample of three patients treated for

four diagnoses by
three physicians.
Physician
Diagnosis A B C
1 11,7,9 8,6,7 5,4,7
2 14,10,11 10,9,8 6,8,7
3 4,5,3 5,5,6 3,4,2
4 10,9,7 6,7,4 5,6,3
If _ 0.05, determine whether differences among the treatment, block, and interactive effects are
significant.

Use Excel to complete the Exercise on  (ANOVA)
2) Answer the questions at the end of the exercise and write 2 pages summary report pls note that no table should be in the words document report and follow the rubric

below to complete this assingment.
3 the originality of this assignment is expected as it will go thru the turnitin for similarity, and it will not be accepted I more than 10% similarity in the

tunritin.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning

the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
A large health maintenance organization is interested in the prescribing patterns of physicians. Suppose that we selected a random sample of three patients treated for

four diagnoses by
three physicians.
Physician
Diagnosis A         B         C
1     11,7,9     8,6,7         5,4,7
2     14,10,11     10,9,8         6,8,7
3     4,5,3         5,5,6         3,4,2
4     10,9,7         6,7,4         5,6,3
If  _ 0.05, determine whether differences among the treatment, block, and interactive effects are
significant.

Broyles Textbook Exercise 7

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%    2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%    3
Satisfactory
75.00%    4
Good
85.00%    5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Performance of Exercise 7 on p. 208 of Broyles using Excel to do the ANOVA and Answering the Research Question    Failure to demonstrate the ability to use Excel

to do the ANOVA and correctly answer the questions attached.    Demonstrates only minimal ability to use Excel to do the ANOVA and correctly answer the questions

attached.    Demonstrates ability to use Excel to do the ANOVA and correctly answer the questions attached, but has some slight misunderstanding of the process and

applications.    Demonstrates ability to use Excel to do the ANOVA and correctly answer the questions attached (in student’s own words).    Demonstrates clearly and fully

the ability to use Excel to do the ANOVA and correctly answer the questions attached (in the student’s own words).
30.0 %Integration of Information from Outside Resources into the Body of Paper    Failure to use references, examples, or explanations.    Provides some supporting

examples, but minimal explanations and no published references included.    Supports main points with examples and explanations, but fails to include published

references to support claims and ideas.    Supports main points with references, explanations, and examples. Analysis and description is direct, competent, and

appropriate of the criteria.    Supports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply. Thoughtfully analyzes, evaluates, and

describes major points of the criteria.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Assignment Development and Purpose    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.    Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed

and/or vague; purpose is not clear.    Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.    Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the

development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.    Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence

of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent

and uses noncredible sources.    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have

questionable credibility.    Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but

not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.    Argument shows logical progression. Techniques

of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.    Clear and convincing argument

presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language

choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.

Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of

sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)    Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed

correctly.    Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.    Appropriate template is used.

Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.    All

format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.    Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.    Reference page is included and lists sources

used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present    Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources.

Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.    In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited

sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :