Implications of utilitarianism have for our treatment of non-human animals

  1. What implications does utilitarianism have for our treatment of non-human animals? How do utilitarians argue for their conclusions about non-human animals? Do you find the utilitarians' conclusions about animals plausible? If so, why? If not, how would you respond to their arguments?
    Write on developing what you take to be the most powerful objection to utilitarianism. 2. Explain the objection in detail, and then describe how you think a utilitarian would reply. Is the utilitarian reply satisfactory? Defend your answer.