How initial assessment methods are evaluated.

Describe the criteria by which initial assessment methods are evaluated. Are some of these criteria more important than others? Compare and Contrast.
What steps should be taken by an organization that is committed to shattering the glass ceiling?
What are the steps an employer should take to develop and implement its policy regarding employment-at-will? Be specific.

Full Answer Section

The importance of these criteria will vary depending on the specific situation. For example, an organization that is committed to diversity and inclusion may place more emphasis on the adverse impact criterion than an organization that is not.

Here is a comparison of the criteria:

Criterion Description
Validity The extent to which the assessment method actually measures what it is supposed to measure.
Reliability The consistency of the assessment method.
Adverse impact The extent to which the assessment method disproportionately excludes certain groups of people.
Utility The value of the assessment method in terms of its ability to predict job performance and make hiring decisions.
Applicant perceptions or reactions How applicants feel about the assessment method.

In general, validity is the most important criterion, followed by reliability. Adverse impact and utility are also important, but they may be less important than validity and reliability in some cases. Applicant perceptions or reactions are also important, but they are often given less weight than the other criteria.

Here are some steps that an organization can take to shatter the glass ceiling:

  • Set clear goals and objectives. The organization should make it clear that it is committed to shattering the glass ceiling and that it is taking steps to achieve this goal.
  • Review its policies and procedures. The organization should review its policies and procedures to ensure that they do not discriminate against women or minorities.
  • Provide training and development opportunities. The organization should provide training and development opportunities for women and minorities to help them advance their careers.
  • Create a supportive work environment. The organization should create a work environment that is supportive of women and minorities and that encourages them to succeed.
  • Track progress and make adjustments as needed. The organization should track its progress in shattering the glass ceiling and make adjustments as needed.

Here are the steps an employer should take to develop and implement its policy regarding employment-at-will:

  1. Define employment-at-will. Employment-at-will is a legal doctrine that means that an employer can terminate an employee's employment for any reason, at any time, without giving notice or cause.
  2. Write a policy statement. The employer should write a policy statement that clearly defines employment-at-will and explains the employer's right to terminate employment.
  3. Communicate the policy to employees. The employer should communicate the policy to employees in writing and in a way that they can understand.
  4. Adhere to the policy. The employer should adhere to the policy consistently and fairly.

By following these steps, employers can help to ensure that their policies regarding employment-at-will are clear, fair, and consistent.

Sample Answer

here are the criteria by which initial assessment methods are evaluated:

  • Validity: This refers to the extent to which the assessment method actually measures what it is supposed to measure. For example, a cognitive ability test should be able to accurately predict how well a person will perform in a job that requires cognitive skills.
  • Reliability: This refers to the consistency of the assessment method. If an assessment method is reliable, it should produce similar results each time it is used.
  • Adverse impact: This refers to the extent to which the assessment method disproportionately excludes certain groups of people, such as women or minorities.
  • Utility: This refers to the value of the assessment method in terms of its ability to predict job performance and make hiring decisions.
  • Applicant perceptions or reactions: This refers to how applicants feel about the assessment method. If applicants find the assessment method to be unfair or biased, they may be less likely to apply for the job.