Different approaches to organizational communication

describe four different approaches to organizational communication. In chapter 3, three early perspectives organizational communication are presented. Compare and contrast each of these approaches and perspectives, then identify circumstances in your personal and/or professional lives in which these approaches and perspectives are applicable. Maximum is 800 words.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

Let’s explore four different approaches to organizational communication, comparing and contrasting them with three early perspectives.

Four Approaches to Organizational Communication:

  1. Formal Communication: This approach emphasizes established channels and protocols within the organization. Information flows through predefined hierarchies, using memos, reports, official meetings, and intranets. It prioritizes accuracy, clarity, and consistency. While efficient for disseminating official information, it can be slow and inflexible, hindering open dialogue and feedback.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

  1. nformal Communication: This approach involves communication outside the formal channels, occurring through casual conversations, social gatherings, and grapevine networks. It’s often faster and more adaptable than formal communication, fostering relationships and building morale. However, it can also lead to misinformation, rumors, and inconsistent messages.

  2. Upward Communication: This focuses on the flow of information from lower levels of the organization to upper management. It includes feedback, suggestions, complaints, and reports from employees. Encouraging upward communication can improve decision-making, boost employee morale, and identify potential problems. However, it requires a culture of trust and receptiveness from management.

  3. Downward Communication: This involves the flow of information from upper management to lower levels. It includes directives, instructions, policies, and feedback. Effective downward communication is crucial for aligning employees with organizational goals and ensuring clarity. However, it can be ineffective if it’s one-sided, authoritarian, or lacks transparency.

Three Early Perspectives:

  1. Classical Approach (Scientific Management): This perspective views organizations as machines, focusing on efficiency and productivity. Communication is primarily downward, with clear instructions and directives from management to workers. Emphasis is placed on formal channels and standardized procedures. This approach is similar to the formal communication approach described above, but even more rigid and top-down. It often neglects the human element and can lead to worker dissatisfaction.

  2. Human Relations Approach: This perspective recognizes the importance of human needs and social interactions in the workplace. Communication becomes more two-way, with an emphasis on listening to employees and fostering a sense of belonging. This approach aligns with the informal communication and upward communication concepts, recognizing the value of employee feedback and interpersonal relationships. However, it can sometimes overemphasize social harmony at the expense of productivity or critical feedback.

  3. Systems Approach: This perspective views organizations as complex systems with interconnected parts. Communication is seen as essential for coordinating these parts and adapting to the environment. It emphasizes both formal and informal communication, as well as upward and downward flows. This approach is the most holistic, incorporating elements of all four communication approaches described above. It acknowledges the complexity of organizational communication and the need for multiple channels and directions of information flow.

Comparison and Contrast:

Approach/Perspective Key Features Similarities Differences
Formal Communication Structured, hierarchical, official channels Similar to Classical Approach More flexible than Classical
Informal Communication Casual, social, grapevine Related to Human Relations Can be unreliable
Upward Communication Feedback, suggestions from employees Part of Human Relations & Systems Focus is specifically on employee input
Downward Communication Directives, instructions from management Core of Classical Approach & Systems Can be one-sided if not balanced with upward
Classical Approach Top-down, formal, efficiency-focused Similar to Formal Communication & Downward Communication More rigid, less emphasis on human needs
Human Relations Two-way, social, employee-focused Related to Informal & Upward Communication Can downplay formal structure
Systems Approach Holistic, interconnected, adaptive Encompasses all 4 approaches More complex, considers internal and external factors

Applicability in Personal/Professional Life:

  • Formal Communication: In my professional life, formal communication is essential for documenting agreements with clients, disseminating company policies, and reporting project progress. In my personal life, it might be used for official correspondence or legal documents.
  • Informal Communication: In both professional and personal settings, informal communication helps build rapport, share ideas, and resolve minor issues quickly. A casual chat with a colleague or a family member can often be more effective than a formal meeting for certain types of communication.
  • Upward Communication: In my previous role, I used upward communication to provide feedback on process improvements to my manager. In my personal life, I might use it to express concerns or suggestions to family members or community leaders.
  • Downward Communication: As a team leader, I use downward communication to delegate tasks, provide instructions, and share updates with my team. In my personal life, it might involve giving instructions to children or sharing information with family members.
  • Classical Approach: While less relevant in modern workplaces, the classical approach might be applicable in highly structured environments with repetitive tasks, such as assembly lines.
  • Human Relations Approach: Building positive relationships and fostering open communication is crucial in any team setting, both professional and personal. Active listening and empathy are essential skills in both contexts.
  • Systems Approach: Thinking about my family as a system helps me understand how different members interact and how changes in one area can affect the whole. Similarly, in a professional context, the systems approach is crucial for understanding how different departments and teams within an organization are interconnected and how communication can facilitate collaboration and problem-solving.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer