Deduction for State and Local Taxes Under Federal Income Tax Law: An Analysis of Multiple Taxation

Respond to the following using current literature:
A provision of the Code allows a taxpayer a deduction for Federal income tax purposes for some state and local income taxes paid. Does this provision eliminate the effect of multiple taxation of the same income? Why or why not? In this connection, consider the following:
a. Taxpayer, an individual, has itemized deductions that are less than the standard deduction.
b. Taxpayer is in the 10% tax bracket for Federal income tax purposes. The 32% tax bracket

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

The Deduction for State and Local Taxes Under Federal Income Tax Law: An Analysis of Multiple Taxation

Introduction

The federal income tax system allows taxpayers to deduct certain state and local taxes (SALT) from their taxable income, which can mitigate the burden of multiple taxation on the same income. However, the effectiveness of this deduction in fully eliminating the impact of multiple taxation is nuanced and dependent on various factors, including individual taxpayer circumstances and the federal tax rates applicable to them. This analysis will examine whether the SALT deduction effectively addresses the issue of multiple taxation, particularly in light of the taxpayer’s itemized deductions relative to the standard deduction and the implications of different federal tax brackets.

SALT Deduction Overview

According to Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 164, taxpayers can deduct certain state and local taxes paid, including income taxes, property taxes, and sales taxes, subject to a cap of $10,000 for married filing jointly or $5,000 for married filing separately. This provision is intended to reduce the overall tax burden on taxpayers who pay state and local taxes in addition to federal taxes.

Does the SALT Deduction Eliminate Multiple Taxation?

The concept of multiple taxation refers to the taxation of the same income by different jurisdictions—federal, state, and local governments. While the SALT deduction provides some relief, it does not completely eliminate the effects of multiple taxation for several reasons:

1. Limited Deduction Benefit: For taxpayers whose itemized deductions do not exceed the standard deduction, such as in scenario (a) below, the SALT deduction effectively provides no benefit. They cannot utilize the deduction unless their total itemized deductions surpass the standard deduction threshold.

2. Marginal Tax Rates: The degree to which the SALT deduction alleviates the burden of multiple taxation is influenced by the taxpayer’s federal income tax bracket. In scenario (b), where a taxpayer is in the 10% federal tax bracket, the benefit received from deducting state and local taxes is minimal compared to a taxpayer in a higher bracket (e.g., 32%). This disparity creates an uneven benefit distribution among taxpayers based on their income levels.

3. Impact of State Taxes: Even with the SALT deduction, taxpayers still bear the burden of state and local taxes without full offsetting at the federal level. The deduction only decreases taxable income but does not refund or credit taxpayers for taxes paid to other jurisdictions.

Specific Scenarios

A. Taxpayer with Itemized Deductions Less than Standard Deduction

For a taxpayer whose itemized deductions are less than the standard deduction, they receive no benefits from the SALT deduction. The taxpayer will opt for the standard deduction, which means that all state and local taxes paid have no impact on their federal taxable income. In this case, there is no relief from multiple taxation because:

– The taxpayer effectively pays both state/local taxes and federal taxes without any offset.
– The full amount of state and local taxes remains a cost to the taxpayer without being reflected in their federal tax calculation.

B. Taxpayer in Different Tax Brackets

If a taxpayer is in the 10% federal tax bracket (scenario b), they would receive a modest benefit from deducting state and local taxes compared to a taxpayer in a higher tax bracket (e.g., 32%). For example:

– If a taxpayer paid $10,000 in state income tax and could fully utilize that as a deduction, they would save $1,000 (10% of $10,000) on their federal tax return.
– In contrast, a taxpayer in the 32% bracket would save $3,200 (32% of $10,000), demonstrating that higher earners receive a greater relative benefit from SALT deductions.

This illustrates that while the deduction helps reduce taxable income and provides some relief against multiple taxation, it does not equitably eliminate it across different income brackets.

Conclusion

The provision allowing deductions for state and local taxes under federal income tax law offers some relief from multiple taxation; however, it does not completely eliminate its effects. The effectiveness of this provision varies depending on whether a taxpayer can itemize deductions beyond the standard deduction and their marginal tax rate. Taxpayers with lower incomes or those opting for standard deductions do not benefit from this provision, while higher-income taxpayers may see more significant reductions in their effective tax burden. Thus, while the SALT deduction mitigates some aspects of multiple taxation, it does not provide a comprehensive solution.

References

1. Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 164.
2. Tax Policy Center (TPC). (2021). “State and Local Tax Deduction.” Retrieved from Tax Policy Center.
3. Holtzblatt, J., & Kearney, C. (2020). “The Impact of State Income Taxes on Federal Income Taxes.” National Tax Journal.
4. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2021). “Individual Income Tax Returns: Characteristics of Taxpayers Who Itemized Their Deductions.”

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer