Read article, “U.S. Is Alone in Rejecting All Evidence if Police Err “ https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/19/us/19exclude.html
1) What are the arguments in favor of the Exclusionary Rule? What are the arguments against it?
2) How do courts in other democratic countries handle evidence that police obtained illegally?
3) Do you believe that America should consider the more flexible approaches to improperly-obtained evidence similar to those of other well-regarded judicial systems abroad? What changes would you make if you could re-write the Exclusionary Rule?