Comparing Disassemblers and Decompilers

 

 

Use the Internet to identify three disassemblers and three decompilers. Compare the features of each. What are their advantages? What are their disadvantages? How specific is the output from a decompiler? What legal issues surround their use? Is it legal to reverse engineer software code? Write a two-page paper on your research.

 

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

 

 

Software Reverse Engineering Tools: Disassemblers and Decompilers

 

Software reverse engineering is the process of analyzing a compiled program (machine code) to deduce its design, function, and implementation, without access to the original source code. The primary tools used in this process are disassemblers and decompilers, which convert the low-level binary code into a human-readable format. While complementary, they operate at different levels of abstraction, each presenting unique advantages, disadvantages, and legal considerations.

Three Disassemblers

 

IDA Pro (Interactive Disassembler Professional)

Features: Industry standard, supports virtually all popular file formats and architectures, features a highly interactive GUI, powerful scripting (IDAPython), and advanced code analysis (e.g., recognizing library functions and data types).

Advantage: Unmatched stability, comprehensive architecture support, and the de-facto tool for professional malware and vulnerability analysis.

Disadvantage: Expensive commercial license; the free version is limited.

Ghidra

Features: Developed by the NSA and released as open-source, supports various processors, and includes an integrated, powerful decompiler. Highly customizable with scripting.

Advantage: Free and open-source, robust feature set comparable to commercial tools, and a strong community.

Disadvantage: Can have a steeper learning curve than some commercial alternatives.

Binary Ninja

Features: Modern, cross-platform interactive disassembler and analysis platform, known for its speed and user-friendly, clean interface. Features a decompiler for all architectures.

Advantage: Modern API and excellent Python scripting support, making it highly extensible and popular with researchers who prioritize automation.

Disadvantage: Newer than IDA, meaning its feature set and architecture coverage are still maturing.

 

Three Decompilers

 

Hex-Rays Decompiler (Integrated into IDA Pro)

Features: Converts IDA's assembly output into highly readable pseudo-code (often C-like). Provides excellent reconstruction of high-level constructs (loops, switch statements).

Advantage: Widely considered the gold standard for native code decompilation, offering the highest quality and most analyst-friendly output for complex, optimized code.

Disadvantage: Requires a separate, costly license on top of the IDA Pro license.

Ghidra's Decompiler

Features: Built-in to the Ghidra platform, providing integrated disassembly and decompilation views. Supports a machine-independent intermediate language (P-Code) for analysis.

Advantage: Free, powerful, and tightly integrated with the disassembler, allowing for seamless cross-referencing between assembly and pseudo-code.

Disadvantage: Output readability is generally good, but sometimes considered a step below Hex-Rays for highly optimized code.