COMPARATIVE CORPORATE LAW ESSAY 2014/2015

COMPARATIVE CORPORATE LAW ESSAY 2014/2015

Order Description

The essay MUST be typewritten or word-processed. Please note the following:

You must reference any cases cited using Oscola

THIS ASSIGNMENT IS ASSESSED and forms 100% of the whole of your assessment.

Word Count: 5000 words INCLUDING footnotes, but EXCLUDING bibliography.
Please check your work carefully to ensure that your footnotes are included in your word count.

Please answer ONE of the following questions:-
Please choose only one question to answer, feel free to choose and answer any question you feel you are convenient and is appropriate to you.
Also please I want the word counts is 5000 words INCLUDING footnotes, but EXCLUDING bibliography.
Please check your work carefully to ensure that your footnotes are included in your word count

1. Does the concept of Enlightened Shareholder Value succeed in bridging the gap between the Shareholder and Stakeholder Value theories?
Critically discuss the advantages, disadvantages and future perspectives of this new approach.

2. The regulatory response to the corporate scandals was diametrically different in the USA and the EU, reflecting their divergent corporate governance systems, legal

culture as well as business practices.
Discuss

3. Although Cartesio follows a series of decisions that opened the door to regulatory competition in company law in the EU, it came as a surprise to a large part of

the academic and business community.
Critically discuss the above statement following the development of the freedom of establishment from the early days of Daily Mail and Centros up until recently.

4. What effect has the 2007-08 financial crisis had on corporate governance with particular reference to the effectiveness of any one of the following corporate

governance mechanisms?

• Director remuneration
• Independent non-executive directors
• Shareholder activism
PTO
5. “Laws differ markedly around the world, though in most places they tend to give investors a rather limited bundle of rights. In particular, countries whose legal

rules originate in the common law tradition tend to protect investors considerably more than do the countries whose laws originate in the civil law, and especially the

French civil law, tradition.” (LLSV, 1998)
Critically discuss this proposition, supporting your arguments with relevant cases and scholarly references.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

find the cost of your paper

This question has been answered.

Get Answer