Collaborating to Make Intervention Decisions

Imagine you have been implementing interventions and progress monitoring students for the last nine weeks. The goals of the intervention are to increase students’ percentile rankings to 50. You are preparing to meet with the RTI team to review specific students’ intervention data to make instructional decisions.

Using the “2nd Grade Literacy Scores,” create a 200-250 word summary for each student to use at the RTI review meeting. Include the following in each student’s summary:

An initial summary and analysis of the progress monitoring data.

Two questions to consider about each student’s progress monitoring data.

Recommendations for instructional next steps (e.g., continue with intervention, change the intervention, or fade the current intervention), including an explanation of how the data supports the instructional recommendation.

If recommending that intervention be added or continued, identify one individual goal based on the assessment data and describe steps to progress monitor the individual goal.

If recommending that intervention be added or continued, describe the developmentally appropriate intervention strategy that will be used to support the student’s instructional goal.

Explain how the student will track their progress and take ownership of their learning throughout intervention instruction.

Part 2: Reflection

In 250-350 words reflect on the process of reviewing data and preparing to collaborate with a team to make intervention decisions. Include the following in your reflection:

Explain how you can use technology to communicate student intervention information and progress appropriately, legally, and ethically to all stakeholders.

Discuss how your intervention recommendations meet each child’s learning needs.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

2nd Grade Literacy Scores – RTI Meeting Summaries

Student 1: [Student Name]

Summary: [Student Name] began the intervention with a 20th percentile ranking. After nine weeks, they have shown minimal progress, increasing to the 25th percentile.

Questions:

  • What additional factors might be affecting [Student Name]’s reading progress beyond the intervention?

  • Would a different intervention strategy be more effective for [Student Name]?

Recommendation: While [Student Name] shows some progress, it is not significant enough to meet the goal of 50th percentile. We recommend transitioning to a different intervention strategy, potentially focusing on phonemic awareness or fluency. The limited progress suggests that the current intervention may not be the most appropriate for [Student Name]’s learning needs.

Individual Goal: Increase fluency to 100 words per minute by [Date].

Progress Monitoring: Track fluency using a one-minute reading passage, recording the number of words read correctly per minute. Graph the progress over time to visually represent improvement.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intervention Strategy: Implement a structured phonics program focused on decoding skills. Use games and activities to enhance motivation and practice. [Student Name] will keep a personal reading log to track their progress and set personal goals.

Student 2: [Student Name]

Summary: [Student Name] started at the 35th percentile and has shown steady progress, reaching the 45th percentile after nine weeks.

Questions:

  • What specific aspects of the intervention have been most successful for [Student Name]?

  • Can we implement a gradual fade-out of the intervention to support continued independent growth?

Recommendation: [Student Name] is demonstrating significant progress towards their goal. We recommend continuing the current intervention for two more weeks and then gradually fading it out, while providing ongoing support through small group instruction and one-on-one coaching. The consistent progress indicates that the intervention is effective for [Student Name].

Individual Goal: Achieve 50th percentile on a standardized reading assessment by [Date].

Progress Monitoring: Continue monitoring progress using the same standardized reading assessment used at the start of the intervention. Track scores over time to visualize progress and assess the effectiveness of the fading intervention.

Intervention Strategy: Maintain the current intervention, but gradually decrease the frequency of sessions and focus on increasing independence. [Student Name] will be encouraged to use self-monitoring strategies and self-correct when reading.

Student 3: [Student Name]

Summary: [Student Name] began with a 15th percentile ranking and has shown dramatic improvement, now reaching the 55th percentile.

Questions:

  • What specific strategies have been most impactful for [Student Name]?

  • Can we incorporate these successful strategies into general classroom instruction for other students?

Recommendation: [Student Name] has exceeded their goal and demonstrates mastery of the skills targeted by the intervention. We recommend discontinuing the intervention for [Student Name] and incorporating the successful strategies into general classroom instruction. The significant progress suggests that the intervention was highly effective and may benefit other students.

Intervention Strategy: No additional intervention is required. [Student Name] will be encouraged to continue reading independently and to participate in classroom literacy activities.

Part 2: Reflection

The process of reviewing data and preparing for an RTI meeting is a collaborative effort that necessitates careful analysis, strategic decision-making, and clear communication.

Technology plays a crucial role in streamlining this process. Secure platforms like Google Classroom or Edmodo can be used to share progress monitoring data and intervention materials with parents and teachers. These platforms also allow for personalized communication with individual students, promoting their ownership of learning.

When creating intervention recommendations, it is essential to consider each child’s individual learning needs. The data provides valuable insights into their strengths and areas for improvement. By tailoring interventions and individual goals to the specific needs of each student, we can ensure that the support provided is effective and impactful.

Collaboration with the RTI team is essential for a holistic approach to student support. By sharing data, discussing insights, and collectively making decisions, we can create a cohesive plan for each student’s success.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer