Clinical performance evaluation
Clinical performance evaluation is subjective and involves the judgments of the evaluator. It is filtered by the evaluator’s perspective, values, and biases. With this in mind, select three clinical evaluation strategies that you believe are fair and accurate in order to measure student learning, and determine their competency and safety in the clinical setting. Explain your rationale for why you selected each of the strategies, and how they align with your personal philosophy of teaching. Make sure the strategies that you selected include ways to evaluate students cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains of learning.
Sample Answer
here are three clinical evaluation strategies that I believe are fair and accurate in order to measure student learning, and determine their competency and safety in the clinical setting:
- Direct observation: This is a traditional method of clinical evaluation in which the evaluator observes the student’s performance in the clinical setting. This can be a good way to assess the student’s cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains of learning. However, it is important to be aware of the evaluator’s own biases and perspectives when using this method.
- Performance checklist: This is a tool that lists the specific skills and behaviors that the student is expected to demonstrate in the clinical setting. The evaluator can use the checklist to track the student’s progress and to provide feedback. This is a good way to ensure that the evaluation is fair and accurate.