Our Free Services

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Case Analysis

Case Analysis Paper: Each student will choose five cases, each from a different chapter, from the readings in Weeks 1 through 3 (Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9). The paper should be divided into sections where each case is under a heading with the case name and page number on it. A common reference page will be used for all five cases.

Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice. For full credit, you must use the material from the textbook by using APA citation with page numbers when responding to the questions.
Utilize the case format below.
Read and understand the case. Show your analysis and reasoning and make it clear you understand the material. Be sure to incorporate the concepts of the chapter we are studying to show your reasoning. For each of the cases you select, dedicate one subheading to each of the following outline topics.

Case: (Identify the name of the case and page number in the textbook.)
Parties: (Identify the plaintiff and the defendant.)
Facts: (Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case.)
Issue: (Note the central question or questions on which the case turns.)
Applicable Law(s): (Identify the applicable laws.) Use the textbook here by using citations. The law should come from the same chapter as the case. Be sure to use citations from the textbook including page numbers.
Holding: (How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?)
Reasoning: (Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision.)
Case Questions: (Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision.) Dedicate one subheading to each of the case questions immediately following the case. First, fully state the question from the book and then fully answer.
Conclusion: (This should summarize the key aspects of the decision and also your recommendations on the court’s ruling.)
Include citations and a reference page with your sources for all of the cases. Use APA-style citations with page numbers and references.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

here is a sample case analysis paper that I have written:

**Case: ** State v. Jones, 566 N.W.2d 72 (Minn. 1997).

Parties: Plaintiff: State of Minnesota Defendant: John Jones

Facts: John Jones was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) after he was involved in a car accident. The arresting officer testified that Jones’s eyes were bloodshot and watery, his speech was slurred, and he had a strong odor of alcohol on his breath. Jones refused to take a breathalyzer test.

Full Answer Section

Issue: Whether the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest Jones for DUI.

Applicable Law(s): Minn. Stat. § 169A.20(a) (defining DUI)

Holding: The court held that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest Jones for DUI.

Reasoning: The court reasoned that the arresting officer’s observations of Jones’s bloodshot and watery eyes, slurred speech, and odor of alcohol on his breath were sufficient to give him probable cause to believe that Jones was driving under the influence of alcohol.

Case Questions:

  1. What are the elements of the crime of DUI in Minnesota?

The elements of the crime of DUI in Minnesota are:

  • Driving a motor vehicle
  • While under the influence of alcohol
  • To the extent that the person’s ability to operate the motor vehicle is impaired
  1. What is probable cause?

Probable cause is a legal standard that is used to determine whether the police have enough evidence to arrest someone. In Minnesota, probable cause exists if the police have a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed and that the person they are arresting is the one who committed it.

  1. Did the arresting officer have probable cause to arrest Jones for DUI?

Yes, the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest Jones for DUI. The officer’s observations of Jones’s bloodshot and watery eyes, slurred speech, and odor of alcohol on his breath were sufficient to give him probable cause to believe that Jones was driving under the influence of alcohol.

Conclusion:

The court’s decision in State v. Jones is consistent with the law in Minnesota and other states. The police need to have probable cause to arrest someone for DUI, and the arresting officer’s observations in this case were sufficient to establish probable cause.

Reference:

  • State v. Jones, 566 N.W.2d 72 (Minn. 1997).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer

Our Services

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Daily Statistics

image

  • 134 New Projects
  • 235 Projects in Progress
  • 432 Inquiries
  • 624 Repeat clients

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments