Basic U.S. and international financial accounting standards.

  1. Compare and contrast basic U.S. and international financial accounting standards.
  2. Explain how key international factors affect business reporting.
  3. Identify key compliance and regulatory requirements.
find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

Comparing and Contrasting Basic U.S. and International Financial Accounting Standards

 

The two predominant sets of financial accounting standards globally are U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). While both aim to provide useful financial information, they differ in their foundational approach and specific rules.

  • Rules-Based vs. Principles-Based Approach:
    • US GAAP is often described as rules-based. It provides detailed, specific rules for various transactions, aiming to minimize ambiguity and ensure consistent application. This can lead to voluminous standards and complex interpretations.
    • IFRS is considered more principles-based. It sets out broader principles and concepts, allowing for more professional judgment in their application. This offers greater flexibility but can also lead to more varied interpretations in practice.
    • Contrast: US GAAP prioritizes strict adherence to detailed rules, while IFRS emphasizes the substance of a transaction over its legal form, guided by overarching principles.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

 

  • Balance Sheet Presentation:
    • US GAAP: Typically presents assets and liabilities in order of liquidity, meaning current assets (e.g., cash, accounts receivable) are listed before non-current assets (e.g., property, plant, and equipment). Similarly, current liabilities precede non-current liabilities.
    • IFRS: Often presents assets and liabilities in order of non-liquidity, placing non-current assets and liabilities before current ones. This emphasizes the long-term capital structure. However, it also allows a liquidity-based presentation if it provides more relevant information.
    • Contrast: The primary ordering convention on the balance sheet differs, impacting the initial visual assessment of a company’s financial position.
  • Inventory Valuation Methods:
    • US GAAP: Permits the use of Last-In, First-Out (LIFO), First-In, First-Out (FIFO), and Weighted-Average methods for inventory costing. LIFO assumes the last goods purchased are the first ones sold, which can significantly affect reported cost of goods sold and net income, particularly during periods of inflation or deflation.
    • IFRS: Prohibits the use of the LIFO method. Only FIFO and Weighted-Average methods are allowed. This is a significant difference that can lead to materially different reported inventory values and profitability compared to a company using LIFO under US GAAP.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer