UKCustomPapers | Analyzing Arguments - UKCustomPapers

Analyzing Arguments

What specifically is Lilienfield critiquing in this piece? Why? How does he seek to limit the scope of his critique? In other words, what does he do as a writer to help readers understand what he is and is not claiming? Consider specific statements he makes as well as where and how often he makes them.
How does Lilienfeld use the three categories of microaggressions as grounds for critique of the general concept? (The simplest way to answer this question will be to read carefully the relevant paragraphs, making a list of Lilienfeld’s claims so that you can see the progression of his argument as well as the distinctions made among the categories.)
To what extent can Lilienfeld’s critique be seen as minimizing or undermining his own acknowledgment of the fact that racism and other sorts of harmful or malicious comments in fact exist and are part of the daily life of members of certain groups?

find the cost of your paper

This question has been answered.

Get Answer