An assessment of Ángel Manuel Rodríguez’s understanding of the concept of remnant

An assessment of Ángel Manuel Rodríguez’s understanding of the concept of remnant Paper details: Introduction 1) Context: What’s the state of things? 2) Problem: Wherein lies the gap/question/problem? 3) Aim: What am I going to do? 4) Significance: Why does it matter? 5) Method: How am I going to do it? 6) Limitations: What am I not doing? 7) Design/Structure/Outline: How am I going to present it? Main body The structure of the main body varies from paper to paper and depends on the way you define your aim and method. The most commonly used structural template may (but need not) include: 1) Description: What is the author/text/theory saying? 2) Comparison: How would you compare and contrast this theory with another/others? How is it similar to and different from them? 3) Analysis: Why is the author saying what they are saying? What is the ground for their theory/proposal? What assumptions lie behind their claims? 4) Assessment/Evaluation: What are the weaknesses & strengths, limitations & potentials of the presented theory? Is the theory biblical/coherent/adequate/well argued? Does it deliver what it promises to? 5) Construction: Is there a way of enhancing the examined theory? Can the insights from the writings of some other author be used to enrich it? How would you take this argument forward? Conclusion 1) Summary: What did I discover? What is the answer to my research question? 2) Implications: So what? What difference does it make? 3) Possibilities for further research: Where to now? Which new questions can be asked? What are the pathways for further research?