Access to Healthcare: A Moral Perspective

There are 4 different “moral arguments” that help to explain views on healthcare provision. Below is a brief definition of each.

Utilitarian moral argument: to maximize the good and minimize the bad.
Egalitarian moral argument: to act on the principle that all people are created equal.
Contractarian moral argument: to act on the value of fairness (without bias).
Libertarian moral argument: to act on the value of freedom.
Please respond to the following questions:
How would you explain access to healthcare and healthcare coverage as an individual’s right?
You will need specify at least one of the above moral arguments in answering this question. (10 points, 3 for specifying and explaining at least one moral argument)
In what ways is healthcare a privilege (whether actual or perceived)?
The post must be at least 250 words.
Include at least 1 outside reference, cited in APA format. This reference needs to be cited both in-text and at the end of the post in a reference list.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

Access to Healthcare: A Moral Perspective

Access to healthcare and healthcare coverage can be viewed as an individual’s right through the lens of the Egalitarian moral argument. This perspective emphasizes the fundamental principle that all people are created equal and, therefore, deserve equal access to essential services, including healthcare. In many societies, the ability to receive medical treatment should not depend on socioeconomic status, race, or geographic location. The egalitarian approach argues that healthcare is a basic human right, as it contributes significantly to one’s overall well-being and quality of life.

When healthcare is treated as a right, it implies that society has an obligation to ensure that all individuals can access medical services without facing financial hardships. This is particularly relevant in discussions surrounding universal healthcare systems, where the goal is to provide comprehensive coverage for all citizens, reducing disparities in health outcomes linked to economic inequalities. The United Nations recognizes the right to health in its Universal Declaration of Human Rights, further supporting the notion that access to healthcare is a fundamental entitlement (United Nations, 1948).

On the other hand, healthcare can also be perceived as a privilege, which reflects the reality in many countries where wealth and social status dictate access to medical services. Individuals with higher incomes often have better healthcare options, including private insurance, shorter wait times, and access to advanced treatments. This perception creates a divide between those who can afford quality care and those who cannot, leading to inequalities in health outcomes. Such disparities raise ethical concerns about justice and fairness in healthcare provision.

In conclusion, while the egalitarian moral argument advocates for healthcare as a right that should be equally accessible to all, the reality often frames it as a privilege based on socioeconomic factors. Addressing these disparities requires a shift towards recognizing healthcare as an inherent right, ensuring that everyone has equitable access to necessary medical services.

Reference

United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer