A new foreign policy initiative

If you were president and wanted to gather support for a new foreign policy initiative, which three U.S. foreign policy actors would you approach and why? What do you think is the most advantageous school of thought for the United States to follow in foreign policy in the future? Why?

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

If I were president and wanted to gather support for a new foreign policy initiative, I would approach the following three U.S. foreign policy actors:

  1. The Secretary of State: The Secretary of State is the President’s principal foreign policy advisor, and they would be responsible for coordinating the implementation of the new initiative.
  2. The National Security Advisor: The National Security Advisor is responsible for advising the President on national security matters, and they would be able to provide insights into the potential risks and benefits of the new initiative.
  3. The Congress: The Congress has the power to declare war, approve treaties, and appropriate funds for foreign policy initiatives. Therefore, it is important to build support for the new initiative in Congress.

Full Answer Section

I think the most advantageous school of thought for the United States to follow in foreign policy in the future is liberal internationalism. This school of thought emphasizes the importance of cooperation between countries, and it argues that the United States can best promote its interests by working with other countries to address common challenges.

Liberal internationalism is a good fit for the United States because it is a country that is deeply committed to democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. These values are also shared by many other countries around the world, so there is a strong foundation for cooperation.

In addition, liberal internationalism is a pragmatic approach to foreign policy. It recognizes that the United States cannot always achieve its goals unilaterally, and it emphasizes the importance of working with other countries to achieve common goals.

Of course, there are other schools of thought that could be argued to be more advantageous for the United States. For example, realism argues that the United States should focus on its own national interests, and it is often skeptical of international cooperation. However, I believe that liberal internationalism is a more sustainable approach to foreign policy in the long run. It is based on values that are shared by many countries around the world, and it emphasizes the importance of cooperation. These are the qualities that will be essential for the United States to maintain its leadership role in the world in the years to come.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer