UNESCO claims that lack of diversity is responsible for the sexism in virtual assistants

UNESCO claims that lack of diversity is responsible for the sexism in virtual assistants. How do they argue these claims according to the document I will provide? Andrea Guzman argues that the sexism of virtual assistants is not inadvertent but is intentional. How does she argue for the claim from the document provided? Which claim (if any) do you think is correct, and why?

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

  1. Analyze UNESCO’s Argument: I will carefully examine the document to identify the specific points UNESCO makes about the lack of diversity contributing to sexism in virtual assistants. I will look for evidence they cite to support their claim, such as statistics on the demographics of developers or examples of how the lack of diverse perspectives influences the design of virtual assistants.

  2. Analyze Andrea Guzman’s Argument: I will identify the arguments she presents to support her claim that the sexism of virtual assistants is intentional. I will look for evidence she uses, such as examples of design choices that reinforce harmful stereotypes or statements from developers about their intentions.

  3. Formulate my own Opinion: I will consider both perspectives, weigh the evidence presented in the document, and formulate my own opinion on whether sexism in virtual assistants is primarily a result of a lack of diversity or intentional design choices. I will explain my reasoning based on the information provided in the document.

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer