Genesis is history

.

Write a 350- to 400-word “Overview of [Non-traditional View]” section that documents the view’s origin and its specific take on the days of Genesis 1. The goal of this section is to present the non-traditional view concisely but fairly, without editorial comment or counterarguments. Describe and discuss this view as if it were being presented by a well-informed proponent. Topics to address include, but are not limited to:
a.Where and when this view entered the theological discussion on origins.
b.The specific view of how the Hebrew word “day” is translated or understood in Genesis 1.
c.How Creation Week is treated as a whole (e.g., as a historical sequence, literary convention, non-historical myth, etc.).
d.Does this view make specific claims about the timing of creation in history or not? For example, does the view require an ancient Earth and universe, or does it specify if/when the days correspond to Earth history?

.

Write a 350- to 400-word “Overview of [Non-traditional View]” section that documents the view’s origin and its specific take on the days of Genesis 1. The goal of this section is to present the non-traditional view concisely but fairly, without editorial comment or counterarguments. Describe and discuss this view as if it were being presented by a well-informed proponent. Topics to address include, but are not limited to:
a.Where and when this view entered the theological discussion on origins.
b.The specific view of how the Hebrew word “day” is translated or understood in Genesis 1.
c.How Creation Week is treated as a whole (e.g., as a historical sequence, literary convention, non-historical myth, etc.).
d.Does this view make specific claims about the timing of creation in history or not? For example, does the view require an ancient Earth and universe, or does it specify if/when the days correspond to Earth history?